HireWire

The daily on talent acquisition technology

2026-06-30

EU Pay Transparency Directive Is Now Law — Salary Ranges Must Appear in Job Postings Across the Bloc

European Commission · 2026-06-30

As of 7 June 2026, employers operating in the European Union must comply with the EU Pay Transparency Directive, which mandates four concrete obligations with immediate effect. Employers must inform job seekers about the starting salary or pay range in vacancy notices or ahead of the interview. They may no longer ask candidates about their pay history. Employees gain the right to request information on their individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, for categories of workers doing the same work or work of equal value. Organisations with at least 100 employees must publish information on the pay gap between female and male workers.

The directive also introduces enforcement mechanisms. If pay reports reveal a gender pay gap of at least 5% that cannot be justified on objective grounds, employers must carry out a joint pay assessment in cooperation with workers' representatives. Workers who have suffered gender pay discrimination can receive compensation, and the burden of proof shifts: employers that fail to meet transparency obligations must demonstrate there was no pay discrimination, rather than the worker having to prove it existed. EU member states are required to set penalties for breaking the equal pay rule, and equality bodies can represent workers in legal or administrative proceedings.

The right to equal pay between women and men for equal work has been a founding principle of the European Union since the Treaty of Rome in 1957. The gender pay gap in the EU currently stands at 11.1%. The directive, adopted in 2023 and now fully in force, represents the most significant regulatory intervention in pay practices since the EU's founding.

For TA leaders with any European operations — whether headquartered in the EU or hiring remotely into EU member states — this directive changes what 'competitive salary' means in practical terms. Job postings that previously relied on phrases like 'salary competitive, based on experience' are now non-compliant. The ban on asking about pay history also means organisations can no longer use a candidate's previous compensation as an anchor for offer construction, a practice that has been shown to perpetuate gender and racial pay gaps.

The compliance timeline is aggressive. Pre-employment obligations took effect from 1 June 2026. The pay reporting obligations for employers with 250+ employees begin in 2027, with the threshold dropping to 100+ employees over subsequent years. This means TA teams need updated job templates, offer-letter workflows, and ATS configurations now — not when the reporting deadlines arrive. The shift in burden of proof is particularly significant: employers that cannot demonstrate transparent pay practices will be presumed to have discriminated unless they can prove otherwise.

All action is situated in your corporate context. These are starting points, not prescriptions — choose what fits.

Connect

Who to talk with in your enterprise

Your legal and compliance team — schedule a briefing specifically on the directive's pre-employment provisions (salary range disclosure, pay-history ban, candidate information rights). Confirm which EU member states your organisation hires in and whether local implementing legislation adds requirements beyond the directive's baseline.

Your head of compensation and benefits — the directive mandates pay gap reporting and joint pay assessments when gaps exceed 5%. Start work now on auditing pay bands by sex for roles with similar scope, because the data infrastructure required for the 2027 reporting deadline needs to be built this year.

Your head of talent operations or ATS administrator — every job posting template, every offer letter workflow, and every recruiter screening script needs updating to remove pay-history questions and add salary range disclosures. This is a configuration change with legal consequences if missed.

Inspect

What to take a closer look at

Audit your last 50 job postings across all EU hiring locations. Count how many include a specific salary range versus those using 'competitive' or equivalent placeholder language. Then check your ATS and CRM configuration: does the application flow ask about current or previous salary? If yes, those fields need to be removed or suppressed for EU-based candidates. Specific tool to look at: your ATS's job requisition template manager and application form configuration — check every field that references salary history or pay expectations.

Reflect

What to think about more deeply

The most interesting question isn't 'are we compliant with the EU directive?' — it's 'if we publish salary ranges for EU roles, why wouldn't we publish them everywhere?' Organisations that disclose pay ranges only where legally required will face internal equity questions from employees in other regions who notice the asymmetry. The directive may force a global pay transparency strategy, not just a European compliance project. Is your organisation ready to have a consistent pay philosophy that can withstand public scrutiny across every market you operate in?